I am new here. I tried smplayer, and found it a very good player.
But why not use GTK3 to draw GUI? GTK3 says it can run on Windows too, and run faster than QT4 on linux.
This forum is deprecated. Please visit https://github.com/smplayer-dev/smplayer/discussions
Why not GTK3?
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Why not GTK3?
by james » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:48 pm
- james
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:12 am
Re: Why not GTK3?
by rvm » Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:58 pm
Switching to GTK would mean to throw away all the work of these 6 years, and start from scratch. Of course I won't do it.
- rvm
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3787
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:25 am
- Location: España
Re: Why not GTK3?
by james » Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:54 am
If six years back, would you prefer GTK2 to QT?
- james
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:12 am
Re: Why not GTK3?
by redxii » Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:07 am
Qt provides more than just drawing a GUI.
GTK also looks like more of a pain in the ass to compile on/for Windows. Qt provides an installer with everything needed to compile a Qt project. From the GTK programs I have on Windows, other than GTK itself a multitude of external libraries are also required to be compiled.
GTK also looks like more of a pain in the ass to compile on/for Windows. Qt provides an installer with everything needed to compile a Qt project. From the GTK programs I have on Windows, other than GTK itself a multitude of external libraries are also required to be compiled.
-
redxii - Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:06 pm
Re: Why not GTK3?
by james » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:47 am
- james
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:12 am
Re: Why not GTK3?
by goetzc » Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- goetzc
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:02 pm
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests